Clean energy intrigue alleged
Environmental advocates say RFP favors hydro over wind, solar
Environmental advocates say a 1,200 megawatt clean energy solicitation developed by the Baker administration is biased in favor of large-scale hydro projects favored by some of the state’s utilities.
The energy diversity legislation authorizing the clean energy procurement was approved last year on Beacon Hill with a provision giving preference to hybrid projects that deliver hydroelectricity in tandem with either wind or solar power. But the environmental advocates say the draft request for proposals includes provisions that make it difficult for wind and solar to compete for space in any procurement.
“It’s an energy diversity bill that stifles diversity,” said George Bachrach, the president of the Environmental League of Massachusetts.
Bachrach said he is wary of the contracting process because the state’s electric utilities are not only helping to write the RFP with the Department of Energy Resources but expect to benefit from it by building the transmission lines that deliver the power.
One provision in the draft RFP requires any project combining hydro and either wind or solar to include an annual schedule of deliveries on an hourly basis. Another would require the energy sources to produce at least 60 percent of the highest annual single hourly delivery during the winter peak. Failure to comply with either provision would trigger financial penalties.
Both provisions are problematic for variable energy sources such as wind and solar, whose output depend on the weather. Solar, in particular, would have a problem with the winter peak requirement, since the sun typically is down by the time the winter peak occurs.
Peter Shattuck, the Massachusetts director of the Acadia Center, an environmental advocacy group, said the RFP should be changed. “As written, the RFP would favor large hydro over the wind and solar that we need to diversify the energy mix, drive in-region economic development, and achieve renewable power requirements,” he said.
Kevin O’Shea, a spokesman for the Department of Energy Resources, issued a statement that did not address the concerns raised by environmental advocates but said Massachusetts “continues to lead in its pursuit of a diversified renewable energy portfolio in order to provide the Commonwealth’s residents with a cost-effective and reliable clean energy future.” His statement said all feedback on the draft RFP will be evaluated and considered.
Environmental advocates aren’t the only ones raising issues with the RFP. Ed Krapels, the president of Anbaric Transmission, which is working with National Grid to import hydroelectricity from Canada along with wind power from New York, said the RFP is very complex. “It will be hard for wind and, therefore, wind and hydro, to bid into this RFP,” he said in an email. “Small solar projects may find it easier because they may not be as dependent on new transmission. I’m sure [Massachusetts officials are] getting lots of comments from stakeholders, so maybe they’ll fix it.”
Peregrine Energy Group, which was hired as the independent evaluator of the contracting process, raised some of the same issues as the environmental advocates in its report on the RFP. But Peregrine didn’t seem overly concerned, saying the issues could be addressed by tweaking some of the RFP’s language. Peregrine raised more concerns about other requirements outlined in the RFP, which the company said “will likely limit participation of wind projects as bidders.”In a conference call on Wednesday with financial analysts, top officials at Eversource sounded very optimistic that Northern Pass, which has yet to win regulatory approval in New Hampshire, will not only pass muster in the Granite State but land at least a portion of the Massachusetts clean energy contract.