SJC quickly dismisses lawsuit over dental ballot question
Court says ballot summary is ‘unquestionably political speech’
THE SUPREME JUDICIAL Court quickly dismissed a lawsuit brought by opponents of a ballot question regulating dental insurance that sought to change the ballot question summary submitted by proponents.
With a deadline looming this week for Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin to begin printing the information book that is sent to voters, the court dismissed the case Tuesday and issued an order with a full explanation on Thursday.
The information book includes short statements about each ballot question, one written by the proponents and one written by the opponents. One of the questions on the November 2022 ballot would require dental insurers to spend at least 83 percent of premiums on clinical costs and quality improvements, rather than administrative costs. Opponents of the question, including the insurer Delta Dental, sued Galvin asking him to change the wording of the proponents’ summary because they said it included a false statement about Delta Dental’s finances. Galvin said he had no authority to change the summary.
The court, in an unsigned opinion, found entirely in favor of Galvin.
While the opponents tried to argue that the statements were libelous, the court found that Galvin cannot be sued for libel when he is publishing something that is required by law.