Fault lines in New England’s climate plan
Shift to carbon-free electricity not going as planned
ELECTRICITY IN MANY WAYS is the key to the region’s climate change plans – bulk up and decarbonize the New England power grid and then use the green electricity to move cars, trucks, and heating systems off of fossil fuels.
It sounds like a solid plan, but this winter Massachusetts and the rest of New England are moving in the opposite direction. Instead of producing more and more carbon-free electricity, the region is suddenly relying on higher carbon-emitting fuels to generate its power.
In January, oil accounted for 12 percent of the region’s fuel mix for producing electricity, an astounding percentage given that oil had never risen above 1 percent for more than a year. Even coal showed up in January, producing 1.7 percent of the region’s electricity.
Gordon van Welie, the president and CEO of ISO-New England, the region’s power grid operator, sent a letter to industry officials and state energy leaders on Monday raising alarms about the adequacy of electricity supplies in New England and warning that the transition to clean energy isn’t happening fast enough.
His statement landed like a thud in the middle of a simmering policy debate between those who insist the region can and must quickly shed its reliance on fossil fuels, particularly natural gas, and those who believe natural gas is a bridge fuel to a renewable future.
The tension between the conflicting views – and the resulting policy stalemates – has left the region in a vulnerable position. New England doesn’t yet have enough carbon-free options – nuclear power plants, offshore wind, and hydroelectricity – to power the grid without natural gas. And it doesn’t have enough pipeline capacity to provide enough natural gas to power the grid during extended cold periods in the winter.Van Welie said in his letter the region narrowly avoided rolling brownouts last month because the weather cooperated. He worries that the region may not be so lucky in the future.