With Commonwealth Wind out, focus turns to Mayflower
Rhode Island officials want wind farm to explain itself
AVANGRID PULLED ITS Commonwealth Wind project out of the latest Massachusetts offshore wind procurement on Friday, and now many are wondering what the lone remaining participant, Mayflower Wind, will do.
When Avangrid on October 20 asked the Department of Public Utilities for a one-month delay to negotiate adjustments to its power purchase agreement in the face of soaring inflation, rising interest rates, and supply chain challenges, Mayflower seconded that call.
After the DPU told the two wind farm developers to either stand by their original contracts or back out of the procurement, Mayflower stood by its original contract while Avangrid eventually decided to drop out.
But Mayflower’s stance is causing more confusion than clarity. Regulators and public officials in Massachusetts have been tight-lipped about the situation, but officials in Rhode Island are demanding answers.
The situation isn’t sitting well with Ronald Gerwatowski, the chair of the Rhode Island Energy Facilities Siting Board, who learned about Mayflower Wind’s financial problems from reading reports in CommonWealth.
Gerwatowski, whose board must decide if Mayflower’s path through Rhode Island is feasible, was startled to learn that the company was telling Massachusetts officials that its project “may no longer be economic and financeable without adjustments to the power purchase agreements.”
Even when Mayflower told the Massachusetts DPU that it would abide by the original terms of its power purchase agreement, it included a cryptic caveat.
“Mayflower will seek to resolve with the petitioners and the Commonwealth the [economic challenges] discussed above, beginning by providing petitioners and the department with detailed third-party analysis demonstrating challenges to financeability, with the goal of finding solutions that provide value to ratepayers,” the wind farm developer said.
Gerwatowski’s conclusion? “Given the apparent status of the proceedings in Massachusetts, there exists a very real and present issue as to whether the Mayflower Wind project is economically and financially viable,” he said.Having no desire to launch a regulatory process that may prove to be unnecessary, Gerwatowski initially gave the company until Monday to explain itself, but he granted the wind developer a delay after it said that “despite diligent efforts to date Mayflower and its witness(es) need more time to prepare.” The company, a joint venture of Shell Oil and Ocean Winds, declined to comment to CommonWealth.