Homelessness no longer just a big-city issue
Western Mass. towns struggling just like urban counterparts
MADELYNN MALLOY and Bob Morin, a homeless couple frustrated by the lack of affordable housing in rural Franklin County, rolled out their blankets this summer on Greenfield Town Common and slept under the stars. Word spread quickly and soon other homeless people around the area joined them. By mid-summer, brightly colored nylon tents all but covered the small grassy strip of land, transforming it into a settlement for 20 homeless people.
“This whole thing started as an act of desperation, but it’s become a political movement,” said Malloy, sitting at a picnic table on the town common with her dog, Stella. “What we are trying to bring to light is the idea that no one who is working minimum wage or living on SSI can afford an apartment anymore. Through no fault of our own, we are unable to live anywhere else, so we are living here.”
The encampment soon divided the town, eliciting the compassion of some residents and businesses and the ire of others who saw it as a takeover of the downtown, repelling residents and potential customers at retail outlets. By summer’s end, Greenfield officials had had enough. Citing a litany of public health concerns from bed bugs to public defecation, the Town Council passed regulations allowing officials to disband the encampment.
The incident in Greenfield underscored how homelessness is not just a problem confined to major urban centers, but an issue confronting smaller communities across the western part of Massachusetts. Along with Greenfield, a city of about 17,000 north of Springfield, Holyoke, Pittsfield, Amherst, and Northampton have all been grappling with problems related to a chronic homeless population, including increased panhandling, squatting in abandoned buildings, and “tent cities” in public areas.
“One challenge we have out here is that the problem isn’t static but the resources are,” Sacchetti said. “The money for homeless services is entrenched in a few agencies in larger cities because, historically, that’s where the problem was. But we’re seeing numbers every bit as high as the eastern part of the state.”
M.J. Adams, the administrator of community development in Greenfield, has been trying to address the problems raised by the tent city on the town common. Working with local social service agencies, she is trying to amp up the town’s ability to respond to the growing homeless population. The shelter that Sacchetti oversees in Greenfield will be renovated to house additional people during the winter months. The town has also partnered with Clinical Support Options, which operates homeless programs in several towns, to develop for chronically homeless adults 8 to 12 single rooms with shared common areas, kitchens, and bathrooms.
Adams is exploring Housing First, a model for ending homelessness that sounds an awful lot like Malloy’s endgame: get people quickly into permanent apartments and provide supportive services to help them stay there. The idea behind the approach is that if a person’s basic needs for shelter and food are met, it’s easier for them to address other issues, such as substance abuse and mental health. It sounds simple, but experts say it’s not.
“It takes a lot of commitment and work to figure out who these people are and how agencies can collaborate to meet their needs,” said Gerry McCafferty, the housing director in Springfield who has become a guru of sorts for smaller communities such as Greenfield, Holyoke, and Amherst that are interested in pursuing Housing First.
Springfield had its own tent city about 10 years ago. Like Greenfield, the crisis forced officials to act, McCafferty said. “That’s the time we started getting serious about implementing Housing First,” she said.
Housing First is a model that was originally implemented in the late 1980s and early 1990s in larger cities such as Los Angeles, Salt Lake City, and New York City. A number of studies since that time show the approach has been effective in getting hard-to-house populations into housing and keeping them there. The one-year retention rate for participants with psychiatric disabilities varied between 75 to 98 percent, depending on how long subsidies and services were continued.
Sacchetti, whose firm provides housing services in western Massachusetts, has reservations about the efficacy of the Housing First model in smaller communities such as Greenfield. “That’s great for the larger cities,” he said. “They have community development block grants and the participation of larger businesses that have an incentive to get people off their doorways, but resources are tighter out here.”
He says the Housing First model can work well for people who are ready to make a change and voluntarily engage in substance abuse or mental health treatment. “Free rent works well for a certain part of the population but it’s one tool in a larger toolbox. There are so many in this current climate with drug addiction and mental illness and who’ve been homeless for years. Give them free rent, you can’t expect them to stop using and get a job.”Bill Miller ,the coordinator of Clinical Support Options in Springfield, said he met with Adams and other Greenfield officials and social service agencies during the summer encampment in an effort to help them think through the possible options. “I was impressed that the town is doing everything they can,” he said. “In one of the meetings, they had a list of everyone living on the Common, and we were talking about what their needs were and what we could do to meet them. That’s what it takes to end homelessness.”
A few of the people on that list, including Malloy and Morin, are currently staying in the local shelter operated by Sacchetti’s organization. Malloy doesn’t like living there but agrees it beats the car that she and Morin lived in last winter. Asked what her next step will be, Malloy says “I don’t know, but I hope to God it’s an apartment.”