Housing panel backs 2 rent control bills
both measures would give municipalities the option
STATE HOUSE NEWS SERVICE
A Beacon Hill committee has endorsed two bills that would clear the way for rent control to return to Massachusetts more than two-and-a-half decades after voters narrowly banned the practice statewide.
The Joint Committee on Housing favorably recommended the legislation on Thursday, advancing it with support from three-quarters of its members as it faces certain opposition from Gov. Charlie Baker.
One bill (H 1316), filed by Cambridge Democrat Rep. David Rogers, would allow any Massachusetts municipality to impose a limit on how much landlords can increase rent each year. The cap would only apply to tenants who earn 80 percent or less of the area median income.
Neither proposal requires local officials to adopt rent control. If the bills are approved, communities could opt in with a local vote, but those that do not support it could maintain the status quo.
If lawmakers want to advance the proposals further, they will need to decide whether the local approval would occur through a vote of the local governing or legislative body or a community-wide referendum.
Sen. Brendan Crighton, one of the committee’s co-chairs, said the panel wanted to “move it along in the process so we didn’t run out of time.”
“We’re dealing with unprecedented times here and, obviously, we’re getting into June soon. We felt like getting the bill out of committee rather than having it stuck there for a prolonged period of time made sense,” he said. “I certainly think at this time, we need to keep an open mind about tenant protections, but some of the finer details still need to be worked out.”
The committee voted 13-2 to give a favorable report to the Connolly and Elugardo bill, according to Crighton’s office. Republican Reps. David DeCoste of Norwell and William Crocker of Barnstable voted against it during a Thursday poll, while Sen. John Keenan, a Quincy Democrat, neither supported nor opposed the legislation.
On the Rogers bill, the committee voted 12-1, with Crocker in opposition and DeCoste, Keenan, and Weymouth Republican Sen. Patrick O’Connor not taking a position, Crighton’s office said.
It remains unclear if either of the proposals are a priority for legislative leaders, but the committee’s support gives the controversial idea some momentum.
Progressive lawmakers and community groups have been pushing for a return to rent control since last year, pitching it as a solution to the statewide housing crisis that officials across the political spectrum acknowledge is disproportionately straining low- and moderate-income tenants.
Baker and landlord groups oppose efforts to bring back the policy. At the same committee hearing, Greater Boston Real Estate Board CEO Greg Vasil said rent control “would be a cold shower to production at a time when we need more production.”
Last year, Baker described rent control as “exactly the wrong direction we should go” and said limiting prices could cut into development of new housing.The governor has been pushing for years to lower voting thresholds for local zoning changes, arguing that many potential projects never get off the ground because they cannot secure a two-thirds majority. Crighton’s committee also endorsed that Baker bill (H 3507) in December.
The Housing Committee also favorably reported a local bill sought by Somerville officials (H 4517) that would give tenants a chance to purchase, alongside non-profits, their residential buildings once the owner agrees to a sale.