Bill would hit Netflix, Hulu with fees
Local access cable TV stations behind effort
STATE HOUSE NEWS SERVICE
AS MORE AND MORE Massachusetts residents cut the cord and turn to streaming video services instead of cable TV, a Dedham representative has filed a bill to charge a fee on streaming services like Netflix and Hulu that would be split between the state, cities and towns, and local access cable TV stations.
On behalf of Massachusetts Community Media, Inc. (MassAccess), which represents community access television providers across the state, Rep. Paul McMurtry filed a bill (HD 4389) that would impose a fee on digital streaming providers equal to 5 percent of the revenue those companies earn in Massachusetts. Streaming providers that do not make at least $250,000 in annual revenue in Massachusetts would be exempted under the bill.
The money collected would be split between the state’s general fund (20 percent), cities and towns (40 percent), and local access cable TV stations (40 percent).
The bill, which has not yet been referred to a committee, was quick to attract attention and support from other lawmakers. As of Thursday afternoon, a bipartisan group of 85 legislators had signed onto McMurtry’s bill as co-sponsors.
McMurtry and supporters say the bill would “create parity” between cable providers, which currently pay some revenue back to cities and towns for local programming, and streaming services. MassAccess said that most local access TV stations “are seeing declining revenue from cable franchise fees for the first time in their histories,” as consumers move away from cable TV in favor of streaming options.
There were 2,193,384 cable TV subscriptions in Massachusetts in 2013, but by 2018 cable subscriptions had dropped off by almost 7 percent, falling to just more than 2 million total subscribers, according to data from the state’s Department of Telecommunications and Cable.
MassAccess said streaming providers rely on local infrastructure to sell their product to millions of Massachusetts residents, “yet pay nothing to use that infrastructure.” The group said McMurtry’s bill seeks to hold streaming services to similar rules and regulations as traditional cable providers.“For decades, the funding provided by cable companies has helped provide funding to support vital programs at the municipal level — including community media centers and PEG [public, educational and government] channels,” Melinda Garfield, president of MassAccess, said. “Community Media centers and PEG channels serve the community, they are an important and vital resource that we need to protect. These new streaming services should be held to the same standards, accept the same responsibilities, and make the same contributions as cable companies.”
Other states have already imposed similar fees on digital streaming services, including Florida, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, and Washington, MassAccess said.