Study of N-S Rail Link was flawed
$17b cost was inflated, didn’t consider the benefits
RECENTLY I HAD a prime opportunity to plead for some action – finally! – on the vitally important North-South Rail Link project in Boston. I joined former governor Michael Dukakis in Boston to testify at a public-comment session of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, adding the Rail Passenger Association’s voice to others who questioned the latest, $17 billion, estimate for the project. The biggest flaw, in my view, is that the inflated estimates (which we think are closer to the $5 billion a Harvard study laid out last year) produced by MassDOT and its consultant ARUP were paired with nearly zero consideration of the benefits.
The result? A study that seems to show a bloated, breathtakingly expensive decade-long project with very few quantifiable benefits.
In MassDOT’s defense, they’re hemmed in somewhat by a process that defines the scope of their studies and the kinds of questions they can consider. But we believe that only means that the process itself should be changed, not that we should make policy on the basis of studies that everyone acknowledges offer only an incomplete picture. The answer from one of the study’s authors, gamely on hand to field questions from the crowd, was particularly dissatisfying. To paraphrase, “assessing benefits is too hard, so we counted mostly costs.” After spending literally years on this study, the taxpayers deserve a better answer than “it was too hard.”
The country deserves a better answer, too. Because this is not just a Boston project, or a regional project, or a Massachusetts project. The North South Rail Link is truly a national issue, connecting Maine to Virginia by closing an unconscionable one-mile gap between North and South stations.
Jim Mathews is the president and & CEO of the Rail Passengers Association, which has 28,000 members nationwide.