Union attacks on Meehan misleading, misguided
UMass Lowell adjunct faculty should negotiate seriously
FOR THE BETTER PART of a decade, I had the privilege of working with then-UMass Lowell Chancellor Marty Meehan. It was exciting to be a part of a team that initiated a remarkable transformation of UMass Lowell that continues today. The campus has experienced dramatic increases in enrollment, retention, and graduation rates; faculty hiring; research funding; philanthropic donations; and facility modernization.
Meehan’s success as UMass Lowell chancellor earned him the presidency of the five-campus UMass system in 2015, where his passion for public higher education is felt across the entire state. Leaders with Meehan’s track record of success are highly sought across the country. This state is fortunate to have his energies focused on advancing opportunities for UMass.
Around the time that Meehan left UMass Lowell to lead the UMass system, I was serving as an academic officer at UMass Lowell, and personally sat at the negotiating table as we began bargaining for a new contract with the union representing adjunct faculty on campus.
Since that time, other campus unions have negotiated and approved two contracts; but negotiations with the adjunct faculty United Auto Workers union leadership remain mired and unmoving despite the good faith efforts of the UMass Lowell administration.
Not only does the campaign mischaracterize President Meehan’s work on behalf of so many students, families, faculty, researchers, and residents, all of whom benefit from a top-tier university in Lowell, the union leaders clearly misunderstand the role of the president.
Union negotiations occur at the campus level between the individual bargaining units and the campus administration. Meehan hasn’t been a party to the negotiations for more than three years.
By targeting Meehan, the union leadership’s apparent goal is to gain leverage in negotiations not just by using the profile he has built over 30 years of public service, but by tarnishing his significant record of achievement on behalf of his alma mater and the city of Lowell.
Rather than a transparent diversion tactic, the adjunct union leadership would better serve its membership, which has been waiting more than three years for a new contract, by focusing on bargaining in good faith to achieve a fair and equitable resolution.
UMass Lowell leaders have a fiduciary responsibility to be judicious stewards of the investment made in the campus by taxpayers, students, and their families.
Over more than 50 negotiation sessions, the faculty adjunct leadership has demanded full health and retirement benefits for adjunct faculty who are teaching two classes a semester — which doesn’t even meet the minimum half-time work load that is required in Massachusetts to qualify for public benefits. They also seek wage increases as high as 50 percent, all at a potential cost to students, families, and taxpayers of more than $24 million.Most adjunct faculty teach one or two courses a year and are employed full time in other jobs in their fields. But even when UMass Lowell offered competitive salary increases to all adjunct faculty and health benefits to senior adjunct faculty teaching three or more courses a semester, the offers were rejected by union leadership.
Donald Pierson is the former provost at the University of Massachusetts Lowell.