Fair Share Amendment will make the Commonwealth stronger and more equitable
Income growth since the late 70s has heavily favored the wealthiest taxpayers
THE FAIR SHARE AMENDMENT — which would assess an additional tax of four percentage points on annual taxable income above $1 million and invest the proceeds in transportation and public education — has been discussed and debated for many years. It has been voted on three times in previous Constitutional Conventions convened by the Legislature, and has received strong support every time. In public polling, this proposal typically receives support from more than 70 percent of voters in Massachusetts.
Together with our colleagues in the Legislature, we will again take up the Fair Share Amendment at Wednesday’s Constitutional Convention.
The reason why the Fair Share Amendment is so popular is that most people recognize that our wealthiest residents can afford to pay a bit more in taxes to help fund investments that expand opportunity and make our Commonwealth more just and equitable for all.
From World War II through the late 1970s, economic growth and prosperity in our state and nation was broadly shared. Since 1979, however, average income for the top 1 percent has grown at an annual rate that is 10 times greater than the growth of average income for the bottom 90 percent. In other words, a hugely disproportionate share of all new income and wealth over the past four decades has gone to those who are already very rich.
As this inequality has grown over the past few decades, Massachusetts hasn’t made the investments in public services that are necessary to make our economy work for everyone. Our public schools and colleges lack the resources they need to prepare students for the 21st century economy. We’ve let our roads, bridges, and public transportation infrastructure crumble because we haven’t invested in maintaining and upgrading them. As a result, for many young people, the American Dream seems ever more elusive, if not downright impossible.
While there are many factors that have contributed to such high levels of inequality, our state tax policy is one of these factors. Moreover, unlike the forces of globalization or rapid technological change or federal fiscal policy, state tax policy is within our direct control. Incredibly, lower- and middle-income taxpayers in Massachusetts pay a greater percentage of their annual income in state and local taxes than the highest-income taxpayers do. This is deeply unfair.
The Fair Share Amendment would raise substantial new revenue to support public investments that are critical to our pandemic recovery and building a more just economy, and do it by making our tax system more equitable. It will provide funds to:
- Continue implementing the Student Opportunity Act to ensure adequate and equitable funding for all K-12 public schools
- Make high-quality public higher education more accessible and affordable for lower-income students and students of color
- Expand access to high-quality, affordable pre-K education for working families
- Improve our transportation system and infrastructure, including roads, bridges, sidewalks, multi-use trails, and public transit
Critics of the Fair Share Amendment claim that millionaires will flee Massachusetts, especially now that remote work has become more popular. Yes, some wealthy people may retire to Florida or Arizona, where it doesn’t snow; but that happens already. The overwhelming evidence from detailed studies of state tax policy strongly suggests that the vast majority of high-income households will not leave the state simply because of a slightly higher marginal tax rate. After all, one of the advantages of making more than a million dollars a year is that you can afford to live where you want, and there are many other good reasons to stay in Massachusetts.
In fact, investments in a stronger education system and improved transportation infrastructure will strengthen our economy, expand opportunity, and make Massachusetts an even more desirable place to live, work, raise a family, and build a business. With a 9 percent top marginal tax rate, Massachusetts would be in line with many other high-income states, including California, New York, New Jersey, Vermont, Minnesota, and Oregon. Even many red states have top marginal income tax rates well above our current 5 percent rate.We hope that our colleagues in the Legislature will join us in voting one final time in favor of the Fair Share Amendment, sending it to the November 2022 ballot where the voters of Massachusetts will have the final say.
Jason Lewis is a Democratic state senator from Winchester. James O’Day is Democratic state representative from West Boylston. They are the lead Senate and House sponsors of the Fair Share Amendment.